Joined
·
1,325 Posts
damn beat me to it95Monster said:
damn beat me to it95Monster said:
See, I don't buy that idea.Mother said:that part isn't th hard part
the hard part is hiding for the rest of your life since they pro'lly have your plate number and thus they know where you live
I liked how the Harley kept going down the road after the rider fell off. [cheeky]95Monster said:
this was discussed elsewhere. the guy being chased had information related to some drug ring or something. i believe he posted bail and was found dead a few days later.IowaS4r said:Think of the risk this idiot created on his 7 minute ride. One, his life. Two, the officers life, then all the other people who either he or the officer could have run into. Some may think it is cute or smart to twist the throttle to outrun the cops and live to tell about it. To me, the thought of some jackass like this causing me or my family harm makes me sick.
I do not agree with these types of chases at all, nor do I agree with the coward outrunning the cops. Be a man and take the ticket. What would the ticket for speeding have cost this guy? He will risk his own as well as our lives and well being for a traffic ticket???? This guy is a coward first, an idiot second, and the shame of it all is he will likely get his license back after paying a large fine, jail time (more of our money to pay for his dumbass choice), and a period of time with a suspension.
Be a man and take responsibility for you choices, good or bad.
That poor bastard.derby said:this was discussed elsewhere. the guy being chased had information related to some drug ring or something. i believe he posted bail and was found dead a few days later.
While I realize you said you don't agree with these types of chases, but the officer made a choice to chase and should be held accountable for anything/anyone he hit. That isn't the case IRL though, the criminal would be at fault for that also. I just wanted to point that out cause of the irony of the last lineIowaS4r said:Think of the risk this idiot created on his 7 minute ride. One, his life. Two, the officers life, then all the other people who either he or the officer could have run into.
Be a man and take responsibility for you choices, good or bad.
Justin Sain said:While I realize you said you don't agree with these types of chases, but the officer made a choice to chase and should be held accountable for anything/anyone he hit. That isn't the case IRL though, the criminal would be at fault for that also. I just wanted to point that out cause of the irony of the last line![]()
<sarcasam>Not really much to talk about, right? The cop was a hero that died in the line of duty.</sarcasam>derby said:remember, try to keep this discussion within the confines of the rules of the board. no politics or cop talk.
i don't dispute that, but i think we were discussing taking responsibility, not heroism.Justin Sain said:Not really much to talk about, right? The cop was a hero that died in the line of duty.
Not cops talk to say: Outside of their legitmate use as off road vehicles for departments with large unpaved areas to patrol, WTF is up with all the police departments using those ungainly ****ing bastards (SUVs) anyways? He'd probably never have lost control of a Crown Vic like that.derby said:motorcyclist is clocked at excessive speed by a trooper who then decides to chase him down. motorcycles is MILES down the road and possibly never knew he was being pursued. trooper loses control of his SUV, resulting in his death.
motorcyclist is found guilty of reckless driving and aggravated criminally negligent homicide.
remember, try to keep this discussion within the confines of the rules of the board. no politics or cop talk.
IMO They both made mistakes. The trooper unfortunately paid with his life. The cyclist will do time. He admitted knowing that he was being chased.derby said:Jury Finds Motorcyclist Guilty in Trooper’s Death
motorcyclist is clocked at excessive speed by a trooper who then decides to chase him down. motorcycles is MILES down the road and possibly never knew he was being pursued. trooper loses control of his SUV, resulting in his death.
motorcyclist is found guilty of reckless driving and aggravated criminally negligent homicide.
remember, try to keep this discussion within the confines of the rules of the board. no politics or cop talk.
...but the officer was in violation of his department's pursuit policy.gordazo said:IMO They both made mistakes. The trooper unfortunately paid with his life. The cyclist will do time. He admitted knowing that he was being chased.
I'm not a lawyer BTW. What happened here is the worst case scenario. Normally the motorcyclist would've gotten away with it, but he didn't. He took a chance and it went awfully wrong. I agree negligent homicide seems a bit harsh, but the fact that he was also violating probation at the time of the incident might have had something to do with it.derby said:...but the officer was in violation of his department's pursuit policy.
who was more at fault? you can argue that the motorcyclist set everything into motion by speeding/fleeing, but at what point does the other party share responsibility for his actions?
a conviction for reckless driving i can understand. i would think that even reckless endangerment would be appropriate. the homicide charge just doesn't make sense to me.
the DA's comments afterward seem to focus more on the fact that his defense argued that he wasn't solely at fault.