Ducati Monster Motorcycle Forum banner
1 - 11 of 11 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
4 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Every Year the Monsters get more toruqe.. ie.
2001 M 620 dark 36.2 ft. lbs. @ 6,000 RPM
2002 M 620 Dark 39.2 ft. lbs. @ 6,700 RPM
2003 M 620 53.3Nm [email protected] 6750
The extra jump this year seems a lot. And I am sure that it happened with every model. Do people notice it? That sounds quite generous to me, and I was one of those people debating getting a new or used monster, but if new ones have the extra torque, I say.. "OH yeah"
bs
 

· Registered
Joined
·
4 Posts
Discussion Starter · #8 ·
Yeah but Foot Pounds are more manly [smiley=waytogo.gif] oh and its cooler too because no one else uses it. DOn't you want to stand out, isn't that why you are on this board anyways?[smiley=wink.gif]
 

· Banned
Joined
·
601 Posts
Funny how the big conversion to the metric system in the US failed when I was in elementary school in the mid-seventies.

Grab any idiot off the street who can't read a children's book let alone a standard tape measure then ask that person to count $50 in mixed coins.

Irony.
 
G

·
Just a note in favour of the inch system,
As a veteren tool and die maker I work in both systems. There is strong data in the metrology industry that backs the inch system due to the particular resolution of a 10,000th of an inch which fits perfectly most precision requirements. Of course millionths are used as well.
With metric we see 100th of a MM as being 4 of the 10,000ths of an inch, so basically one fourth the resolution. Not as usefull because when we go to 1000th of a MM we have a prohibitively expensive gage with limited range, in other words, overkill.
Mike
 
1 - 11 of 11 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top