Bloodshot said:
You still have to brush the lever though. When clutchlessly upshifting you blip the throttle only long enough to slip the pre-loaded shift lever into gear. I can blip the throttle faster than my fingers could respond to any type of brushing of clutch lever. I still stand by what I said before, I don't see how it's physically possible for flat shifting to be faster.
I shift without the clutch regularly, but have not tried this 'flat shifting.' I'm going to give it a go though, here's how it seems it could actually in fact ultimately be faster:
You never get off the throttle. That means that any energy that's diverted from the tranny/wheel when you brush the clutch to shift is in essence stored in the flywheel, and fed to the road at the end of the process. You've been adding power the whole time.
On the other hand, to shift clutchlessly, you need to reduce power. No matter what, because of this, for a given period of time, (even if the clutchless shift is faster), you've produced less power than you would have if you'd just kept it wfo. It's just physics...
This is not true if you're already at redline, and peg the rev limiter as a result of brushing the clutch, but in every other case, it seems to me that the flat shifting might actually be faster.
Having said that, clutchless shifting (if done properly) is almost certainly smoother, since the flat shifting will result in a slight surge in power as the clutch re-engages (even as minimal as the disengagement is). My guess is that the motogp folks use the ignition cutoff switch because a) they 80% fry their clutches just on the start and can't afford to further abuse them, b) it's smoother than brushing the clutch, c) if already at redline, they overrev the engine if they do the clutch-brush.
All guesses, but it sounds right to me...