Ducati Monster Forums: Ducati Monster Motorcycle Forum - View Single Post - dot vs. snell, great artical in the june Motorcyclist
SportbikeTrackGear

» Insurance
» Sponsors
View Single Post
Old 05-19-2005, 06:59 PM   #13 (permalink)
fzr400tony
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: dot vs. snell, great artical in the june Motorcyclist

i didn't read the article, but i think motorcyclist is the leader in whoring themselves to advertisers (anyone care to count the # of pages of parts unlimited ads? and that's not a dig on z1r or parts, both of which are fine companies, especially parts unlimited).

anyway, you can compare snell vs dot and write your article to pick one over the other and get your reader to believe your findings.

you can compare bsi to snell and do the same. suomy and snell have articles out there that will show you how easy it is.

for example, suomy says bsi tests more helmets and one of each batch of helmets (about 1 in 64) is tested to meet that standard. therefore because the helmet is tested throughout its production cycle its better than snell because once a model is certified its good to go.

snell says the bsi standard isn't as hard to pass as the snell standard, therefore while they test more helmets the standard is so low that it's easy to pass.

which is better? bsi or snell? who knows? it'd be nice if we could do both, but we can't.

=================================================

here's some quick commonsense realities. the outer shell's main purpose is to pervent penatration and destruction of the foam inner liner.

the foam inner liner is what protects brain matter by decreasing the rate of its deceleration in an accident (like an airbag).

now that this is clear (and i hope that the motorcyclist article made sense of this), let's move on.

i'm sure you've the 35mph side impact test that some insurance foundation is doing. the nhtsi says that 35 mph doesn't represent most accidents, since most accidents happen at a slow rate of speed.

and this is your fiberglass/plastic debate in a nutshell (and yes, it's been around for a long time, they just used to call it the snell v. dot debate).

do you want to live through the worst case scenario?

or

do you want to be 100% okay in a 100% survivable accident?

my point isn't that one is better than another. my point is one is better for a given situation than another. i personally would rather live through a brutal high speed crash. as a matter of fact, i have lived through a 100mph get-off, several of my friends have and we all had one thing in common, expensive fiberglass lids on our heads.

if you think you can't live through a 100mph get off, then get a plastic helmet and you'll likely not get a concusion if you get rear-ended by a little old lady doing 10 mph, while laughing at the fact that you could buy 7 cs-12's for the price of my corsair.
  Reply With Quote
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Motorcycle News, Videos and Reviews
Ducati Forum Harley Davidson Honda 600RR Kawasaki Forum Yamaha R6
1199 Panigale Roadglide Forum Honda CBR1000 Vulcan Forum Yamaha R1
Ducati Monster Harley Forums Honda CBR250R ZX10R Forum Star Raider
Suzuki GSXR V-Rod Forums Honda Shadow Kawasaki Motorcycles Star Warrior
SV650 Forum BMW S1000RR Honda Fury Kawasaki Versys Drag Racing
Suzuki V-Strom BMW K1600 Triumph Forum Victory Forums Sportbikes
Volusia Forum BMW F800 Triumph 675 MV Agusta Forum Streetfighters